Duilio Beretta vs Gleb Sakharov Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W L W L
Form
L W W L W L L W L LHead To Head: Beretta 1 - 0 Sakharov
They have played 2 sets in total, with Beretta winning 2 and Sakharov winning 0. The last match between Beretta and Sakharov was at the Blois Challenger, 12-06-2014, Second, Clay with Duilio Beretta getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Duilio Beretta | 1 |
| Gleb Sakharov | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Duilio Beretta
Player
Gleb Sakharov
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:17:46 | Average Match Time | 1:17:46 |
| 69% (38/55) | 1st Serve % | 60% (32/53) |
| 74% (28/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (21/32) |
| 59% (10/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (9/21) |
| 100% (4/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 43% (23/53) | Return Points Win % | 31% (17/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Duilio Beretta Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Santos
Player
Duilio Beretta
84%
(
74 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Duilio Beretta
Player
Federico Zeballos
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
0
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diego Hidalgo
Player
Duilio Beretta
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Duilio Beretta
Player
Tomas Farjat
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
77%
(
79 of
102)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
50 of
79)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Duilio Beretta
Player
Fabrizio Ornago
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Duilio Beretta
Player
Hugo Dellien
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
Duilio Beretta
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Duilio Beretta
Player
Ignacio Monzon
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Duilio Beretta
Player
Wilson Leite
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Gleb Sakharov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Gleb Sakharov
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve %
77%
(
54 of
70)
11
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Gleb Sakharov
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
13
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
45 of
55)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
12 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
23 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Kyle Mckay
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Gleb Sakharov
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
47
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Gleb Sakharov
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
14
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Leonardo Iemmi
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Gleb Sakharov
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
73%
(
84 of
115)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
57 of
84)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
34 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
7-5 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Mattias Southcombe
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcus Walters
Player
Gleb Sakharov
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (205/138) | Win/Loss | 60% (413/273) |
| 58% (468/338) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (909/648) |
| 54% (3986/3439) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7752/6904) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 137 | Aces Total | 1445 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 504 | Total Double Faults | 738 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 580.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 587.16 |
| 60% (4327/7153) | 1st Serve % | 62% (14534/23460) |
| 65% (2813/4327) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (10242/14534) |
| 47% (1342/2826) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4492/8926) |
| 45% (326/721) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1054/2519) |
| 41% (2967/7192) | Return Points Win % | 40% (9676/24004) |
| 61% (198/326) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (407/676) |
| 29% (4/14) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 52% (49/94) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (101/181) |
| 51% (51/100) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (103/191) |
| 84% (206/174) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (403/360) |
| 15% (206/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (403/43) |
| 22% (137/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (283/53) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
